As we go to press...
Rome’s “June
Offer” to the Society of St. Pius X
By John Vennari
![]() |
|
Archbishop
Lefebvre |
This is a
last-minute addition to this issue. The news broke as we go to
press.
It has just
been released in the media that on June 4, 2008, the Vatican’s Cardinal Castrillón Hoyos
issued what has been called an “ultimatum” to the Society of St. Pius X regarding
regularization.
The Cardinal’s
letter listed five points that the Vatican expects the SSPX to accept,
which are quoted below verbatim:
1. The
commitment to a response proportionate to the generosity of the
Pope.
2. The commitment to avoid every public intervention which
does not respect the person of the Holy Father and which may be negative to
ecclesial charity.
3. The commitment to avoid the claim to a
Magisterium superior to the Holy Father and to not propose the Fraternity in
contraposition to the Church.
4. The commitment to display the
will to act honestly in full ecclesial charity and in respect for the authority
of the Vicar of Christ.
5. The commitment to respect the date -
fixed for the end of the month of June [2008] - to respond positively. This
shall be a condition necessary and required as an immediate preparation for
adhesion to accomplish full communion.
I do not
presume to speak for the Society of St. Pius X, but I would be surprised if the
SSPX accepts these conditions. The conditions are remarkably vague and could be
easily interpreted against the SSPX’s public resistance to the Council and the
New Mass.
As for “The
commitment to avoid the claim to a Magisterium superior to the Holy Father and
to not propose the Fraternity in contraposition to the Church,” the SSPX has
never done this, but only adheres to what the Church has always taught, and
judges today’s progressivist teachings in that light. This, in fact, is the duty
of all Catholics, and it is what Saint Vincent of Lerins instructed Catholics to
do when “some new contagion threatens a part of the Church or the whole Church
at once”.
The conditions sent by Cardinal Castrillón do not deal
with the doctrinal issues of Vatican II, despite the fact that the Society of
St. Pius X has stated repeatedly for
decades that an honest discussion of the manifold problems with the
Council is vital before any regularization can be seriously considered.
This issue of
CFN goes to press on June 25, so the reader [of the print edition] may already know the SSPX’s answer
to Cardinal Castrillón, which was to be expected at the end of June.
What follows is
a transcript of sections of Bishop Fellay’s lecture at the ordinations at Winona on June
20, 2008 in which he alludes to this latest communication from Cardinal
Castrillón.
Excerpts
from Bishop Fellay’s Ordination Sermon
[ Certainly, my
dear brethren, you expect from me today also a certain update of how things are
going with Rome.
All these excommunications, or the lifting, or the retraction of the decrees of
excommunication: is it coming or not? Frankly, I don't know. My impression,
right now, is that we still can wait for a while, and maybe a good while. And
why so?
Because the approach we have towards the question is not
the same as the one of the
In '75, '76, it
was already the same problem. Before the suspension of '76,
It is so far that
(Regarding the
Latin Mass Motu Proprio) Let me
try to give you a picture. The Mass is the visible part of this big fight. It is
like the tip of an iceberg. The Old Mass is the tip of the iceberg of Tradition.
The New Mass is the tip of the iceberg of Vatican II, and of these modern ideas,
what they call the “spirit of the Council”, which has come in with all these
reforms… this new way of looking at things… the “positive” way of looking at the
world and other religions, and insist on looking at what is good in them. That’s
not false; there is some good in
them. But that’s not the point. In every evil, you have some
good…
… When we see
the Latin Mass Motu Proprio, we
get the impression that they have taken the tip [of Tradition], which means they
have accepted everything below the tip of that iceberg. That is not what they
did. They tried to take the tip [of Tradition] and plant it on the other iceberg, on the iceberg of the
new
thing.
And so we have
two tips, and they say it is only one tip…If you try to look under the water,
what is below, you will see that they maintain the only thing you can have below
is the new thing, but they call it “Tradition”. It may create a lot of
confusion…
…And now, we
are, should we say, something like at a crossroads. And in a certain way,
So, we have no choice, we are not going this way, we
are continuing what we have done, we have fought now for forty years to keep
this Faith alive; to keep this Tradition not only for ourselves, but for the
Church. And we are just going to continue, happens what happens. Everything is
in God's hands. If God wants this proof, this trial to continue, it may
continue. He will give us the grace we need for it. No fear, we'll wait for
better times. That's what the Archbishop said twenty years ago. That's what we
continue to say today.
Of course we have to do all we can to have
this Faith to be continued, to be preached everywhere, this Faith to be really —
and all this Tradition to be really — back in the Church. We have to do whatever
we can for this, but nothing else. It is a hard time, my dear brethren, but it
is not ourselves who are going to change it. We are in these circumstances, we
did not cause them. So we depend on God.
From the
July 2008 edition of
Catholic Family News
MPO Box 743 * Niagara Falls, NY
14302
905-871-6292
CFN is published once a month (12 times per year)
Subscription: $28.00 a year.
Request sample copy
Home • Audio
Cassettes & CDs • New DVD Offer • CFN